@ejonesss one thing most folks don't consider is that programs with relatively few downloads in todays internet world will automatically be flagged as "suspicious" since they haven't built up enough reputation for the scanners to mark them as okay... so when people talk about "false-positive" flagging, its generally this occurring... simply put, it was smart of the scanning companies to flag "new" programs as something to be concerned about, but they have done a TERRIBLE job at letting end users know that is why the particular program was flagged and removed... they should clearly inform the user the scanner didn't find anything, but because its such a new program the person may want to reconsider using it, and then make them jump through hoops and click a bunch of confirms before letting them... since thats how most malicious software spreads, its so new it doesn't have entries yet as malicious or safe, so its assumed malicious by default...
this doesn't mean you should ignore those warnings though, always take them serious and never just assume this is the cause, I just wish they all were better at reporting why things are marked sometimes as suspicious and removed...
