Best posts made by burst1

@Lexicon said in [ANN] Lex4All:

@burst1 said in [ANN] Lex4All:

Sorry @Lexicon

I'm all for outing these guys, but I would (and I'm sure many would) appreciate clear distinction that the scam is not burstcoin itself. When the article starts .... "Today's post is another bad one with respect to Burst Coin." it can be misleading. I'm sure most people on here get it... but to the lay person evaluating BURST they may not. I just think it's very important to distinguish who/what the scam is. The coin itself is great, and 99% of the people involved also seem great. There will always be a few bad apples involved... especially where there is significant money involved.

funny cause i showed someone else to proof read it and they added that line. not me.

before that line read "Today's post is another bad one"

its more continuing from my prior posts where most of its bad news. e.g. ninja funds stolen. development funds mishandled. rather than saying burstcoin is bad. its saying burst-coin has bad news

I get it. I know it's not your intent. I think everyone here would have preferred an amicable divorce with things handled behind the scenes... quite obviously that's not happening.

I think everyone just has to remember the money coming into crypto today isn't just programmers, coders, computer people, etc... it's normal people without a lot of knowledge. People who may misinterpret some of these posts/articles... "so I open a BURST wallet this guy Focus can steal my coin"? Or "I can lose my mining profit to some guy named Adam because BURST is his scam"?

I just think there needs to be clear separation with Adam/Focus and what BURST ACTUALLY is and what the rest of the community is like. It's two people acting unethically ...it could be through any "platform"... BTC, ETH, LTC. They've just captured a significant audience with BURST at the moment.

@TheMartian said in I almost went full retard:

@falconCoin said in I almost went full retard:

@nameless i just listened to it and tell me where you feel it was spliced?

i would need to listen a few more times but i was a partner in a recording studio and i did not catch it but my engineer will be here to grab his les paul i'll ham listen without knowing anything and see if he catches it

Hello! I'm new to the community, this is only my second post and I hope I'm not going to get attacked by this, but I also work at a studio, we do video, audio, web and all other work for a TV channel. I'm not an audio expert but I can easily hear problems or modifications in audio recordings, and as @falconCoin says, this audio doesn't seem to have been altered in any way.

At the beginning... the 9 second mark...it definitely skips a little un-naturally in the conversation from Crowetic to Adam... for what it's worth.

This whole thing is so contrived... where and how these guys took the funds was wrong... they admitted to it and everything was put back (to the best of my knowledge). The sell wall strategy (whether you agree or not) went against Adam.... the end, that's it. That's what this whole thing is about. There wasn't theft, stealing, or a cover up. They messed up, admitted, apologized everyone should have moved on. Instead it's drama forced upon everyone by whom?

Adam was recording this in the first place because? And this idea of a Ponzi scheme .... ummm...ponzi's end eventually. If it's been exposed now why are Nameless and Crowetic still working together and friends? Shouldn't Nameless have disappeared or be brought up on charges? I wonder how many of Bernie Madoff's victims are still hanging out with him?

It's just so obviously forced and contrived.

Doesn't surprise me, money makes people do funny things. Not in your guys shoes, but sounds like there was too much trust and not enough checks and balances in place.

Just hope you guys stick with it, impressed with what you've done thus far.

There will always be disagreement when there are many people involved... everyone has their opinions and perspective.

BUT... the current nastiness, drama, and immaturity is mainly the result of ONE PERSON. Everyone needs to keep that in mind. There are still great people here .... and BURST is still BURST. Don't let that one person get the best of you.

All I'll say to the developers and people behind the scenes:

I don't post much and don't know any of you guys. I got into BURST last fall because it seemed like a great concept and after fishing around here for a bit... there seemed to be a # of really smart dedicated people behind BURST.

What made BURST have potential back then still exists today. I really hope you guys don't give up. Obviously there is a lot of sh!t going around, but once the loudmouth milks his followers for as much as he can... he'll look for his next scam. Plus he's trying to divide and conquer... he wants people to give up, to quit. I sincerely hope you guys stick with it and fight back in your own way.

Thanks to all the developers for all their hard work to date!

Trading aside with MTMGaming...

Can someone explain why this is even an asset? I think BURST Nation tried to explain exactly their definition of an asset (it may have been in writing or on one of their videos... or perhaps both). By BURST Nations' own definition why is this an asset?

It's just some guy gambling correct? He may or may not be winning ...but that isn't proven extensively (besides a few screenshots)... or maybe it is, I haven't followed results that closely?

So why is this an asset by BN's definition or any definition for that matter?