And the BRS 2.4.0 shows only Peers with 2.4.0 as up to date. BRS 2.3.0 are shown as not up to date. In my case only 6/25 are up to date (the 6 are running 2.4.0 and the rest 2.3.0).
Therefore Downloading blockchain from scratch is realy slow at this time.
And the Java is running all CPU Cores (4 of 4) on 100 % during running the wallet BRS 2.4.0.
Actually for me the 2.4.0 is not a good choice. The 2.3.0 is running smooth.
@ryanw Harry says the solution for the warning message.
Using Java 8 and all warning messages during startup are gone but when testing 127.0.0.1:8125 the same message:
"Warning!This node is not running on your local computer. Be cautious when using public wallets" is shown.
So i know i am running my node on my local computer but the BRS 2.4.0 Wallet is showing me another information although using Java 8.
I can't understand "This node is not running on your local computer" why BRS 2.4.0 is showing this message ?
@haitch Hi i am just testing the new wallet and got some issues. I posted my issue on:
Some advice ?
Hi i am just trying the BRS 2.4.0 and got this warning on every start.
[INFO] 2019-07-02 18:30:20 brs.db.sql.Db - Using SQL Backend with Dialect MariaDB
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.jooq.tools.reflect.Reflect (file:/home/.../burstcoin-2.4.0/burst.jar) to constructor java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup(java.lang.Class)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.jooq.tools.reflect.Reflect
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
And when testing 127.0.0.1:8125 I got this message:
Warning!This node is not running on your local computer. Be cautious when using public wallets.
Don't know what is going on but it's not normal that way.
Some advice ?
Whats is the community.
There can be no real community in forums.
If i would create a new coin for PoCC like Chia or BHD and i dislike the other coin like Burst.
I would go to the forums create an account and shout at the developer team until they stop development. Nice and easy if that is working.
Perhaps we should have a look on SmartCash. What if we get an similar voting system which depends on holding coins. So if we can ask the community for decicions. And only the real invested can vote. So we know that every man who is voting is realy invested and the more the more oting is possible.
The end is always the beginning of a new. We have to think of possibility to solve problems in burstcoin in a less toxic and not destroying way.
@zohtar
They should have informed the miners before testing. That was the failing communication. I think they don't come back. They don't want to come back. And in the end of my text i wrote it. They seems to be highly skilled developers and it's hard to believe that they didn't know what shitstorm from the community comes on dual mining and not informing about that before.
It seems they looked for a way out and used the community shitstorms to exit burstcoin development.
So if the community doesn't matter like they say they would have working on Dymaxion without drama . It 's like in the real world on the working place. If yout want to quit your job you find a reason to quit without saying the real reason if you don't want to.
Perhaps we get a fork or something else from the POCC, we will see.
POCC is now leaving BURST, they wrote it on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/PoC_Consortium/status/1080727862238416896
I have been watching the whole discussion on reddit and the discord over the last weeks and I am dissapointed about the lack of professionality from every side.
So the POCC is leaving BURST after the complaints about double mining on their pools without informating their miners.
Every miner has the right to complain about everything he wants to but has to keep in mind that the POCC worked for free and should use fair diplomatic words for the complain.
And the POCC Team should be diplomatic too. For me they did good work und good software. I can't believe that they are leaving BURST only of the complaints the last weeks about the double mining.
The POCC tells they owe "us" nothing. And they are right about that.
But it's like in real life. There are always some people that are shouting and complaining about things.
Only someone is complaining about something or me I don't quit at all !! In real world business you need reliability.
Of course POCC owes the community nothing and I don't know their real reason why they are leaving. But in my opinion they overreacted in some way (and the community too)
For me it sounds like General Motors stops building cars because someone is complaining. If GM would do this they would be called crazy.
Too much emotions on all side the last days. I don't know the POCC members and their (de-)motivation to work on burst.
If I would have the skills to build the dymaxion i would never quit because of something like this.
We need highly skilled developer and programmer who can realize something like DYMAXION on the technical side AND we need the professional for emotions and marketing who can moderate when problems are discussed. It's like in the real world. Some guys are genius in developing but have lack in human interaction. Some guys can talk over hours and can convince with calm professional words without drama but can't develope anything. Perhaps someone can do both !!
Cryptocurrencies and in special BURST is nothing emotional. But humans are able to make strange things when they feel hurt even when it seems to be totally absurd.
In a certain way i think the POCC feels hurt by the community. All in all they shouldn't have made this hard decision to leave burstcoin. It is their decision.
If we want anybody (professional businesses or privat people) to adopt or invest BURST the most important thing is realibility. If you announcend something official you better should do the work until it is completed or you shouldn't announce it.
The POCC wrote on Twitter that they will do whatever they want to do with their pools and that is ok because this time they said it clearly and the miners knows about that. So everybody has the choice to use or not to use the POCC pools.
I really appreciated the previous statements of POCC during the network attack summer 2017. The said they are here to stay and not be emotional drama like burstnation and that they are here to stay in the long run. And now all this emotional drama during the last weeks adn then this hard short end. For me the long run in not less than 5 years. POCC seems not to be appreciated about the "community". They say there is no real communtiy. But that is the lack of all decentral anonym cryptocurrencies and i think perhaps that could be reason the most cryptos will fail.
The "communtiy" is the same like before all this trouble over christmas. Nothing has changed. The POCC wrote they "also came to the conclusion, that there is not a healthy culture of give and take between core team and community and what’s worse". I am sorry to read this. I always thought their aim to be in the top 10 would give them more than the community could give on money. Should the community give more love or be more thankfull, I don't get it ? I always has been thankfull and wondering how fast they are developing software for burst over the last year!!
For the conlusion i give you discussion about the dual mining complaints i wished for
Community:
Hey, are dual mining on your pools without informing me ?
Possible answer from POCC
Yes we did some testing for this option and in the future you have the choice to do dual mining or not. And if its stable we reward you someway. We are dual mining with BHD, we know it's not you favorite coin but we want to give you this options with our pools. If you don't like dual mining you can deactivate this option.
Possible answer from POCC
Yes we did some testing for this option. We are dual mining with BHD or any other poc coin in the future. We know it's not your favorite coin but we wanted to do this to give more efficiency to our Pools and give the developers some more money for developing burstcoin. They do hard work and we figured out that there is not a healthy culture of give and take between core team and community, so it would be a good support from the community for us doing dual mining.
But it wasn't that way.
I read something about attacking BHD and selling BHD to destroy BHD. An 51% attack, Emotional DRAMA, Trust, people attacking each other, People like nixops got banned from cg discord ...... . Personally i was thinking " what the hell is going on its christmas ". It could have been easy for POCC / Community to give an short answer and calm down but it wasn't that way. The drama keeps up more and more and i think that some people want to get this drama for their own reasons. That's what i am disapppointed, all of this drama and emotions even the leaving of POCC was unnecessary. The PoCC did amazing work and had the right vision (Dymaxion) but in communication this time they failed. What did POCC team think of what happend if some miners on their pool finding out that they are dual mining with no reward and more electricity using and the POCC team made no information about that. They have to know that some miners would freak out about that and that they complaining about this in the forums. The POCC must have known that some miners are not amused about that.
During the announcing of the POCC Team they told not to be emotional and that they professionals and want to develop Burstocin without drama to the top 10. I am just wondering what happened the last 4 weeks to the real goal " The Dymaxion". I can't believe that this vision is falling victim the dual mining and lack of communication skills on all sides over the last 4 weeks.
I kbow its far in the future. Perhaps end 2019 or 2020 but when i think of PoC3 I am asking me some questiongs.
Why should a miner store PoC3 data. That would take all his traffic from his internet connection and the speed goes down ?
Why should someone store his content in PoC3 ?
@tedrogers Hi i am using CreepMiner for several months. Intensity is setting the core CreepMiner will be using for mining. So in general Intensity you have to the threads (for example: 8 Ccore + Hyperthreading = 16 Threads = Intensity setting to 16)
The more threads the faster is the reading.
The Intensity is setting the threads. Why your core i7 is creating an error with values grater than 8 isn't clear.
In my case the threadsetting with the Intensity works fine and Creep is running good.
Hi,
actually i am looking on Xchange.me homepage for some information. I checked the trades between Poloniex, Bittrex and Xchange.me and i can say that Xchange.me has a good exchange rate in comparison to Poloniex and Bittrex.
So all in all it seems for me easier and a bit more free and anonymous trading of Burst on Xchange.me. Until now it didn't trade on Xchange.me but i am thinking to go there instead of Bittrex and Poloniex . Xchange.me seems not be in the us. It seems to be in Poland but it don't of this is a good thing or not.
Has someone else tried Xchange.me ? Some experiences ? Is it serious ?